All of us eat so everyone has an opinion about the food. But if health is the goal, mere opinion does not count, but not bland or majority rule.
Most people think of the average diet cooked on the official food pyramid is based just fine. Some eat mostly fast food. Others claim veganism (eating only foods of plant origin) or ova-lacto vegetarian (vegetables, milk and eggs). There are also supporters of particular foods such as fruit juices, soy products, and macrobiotic cookingCereals and rice.
One can make arguments for their beliefs. You can miss a few examples of people, the disease and live longer. Some argue that morality and ethics, as if to say the life of sentient animals should not be sacrificed for food. Others have their eating habits by the standards of Scripture that avoiding certain types of foods and other sacred. Others just eat what is good and this is logical enough for them.
Food beliefs seem to be almostreligious character. People feel cared for and very eager to eat, not like other interference. But because health is at hand, there is the mouth, the thought, honest reflection and a willingness to change in order.
It is easy to deceive, because the eating habits, do not manifest their full effect until late in life. Diet can also affect future generations of genetically compatible. In this sense, food ideas and religion in hundredsseven different, everyone is entitled to have the truth. But none of them has to fear for the case of waste does not occur until all dead and buried for the afterlife.
The body is extremely adaptable and will try to survive with what is given. If the food is wrong, there is usually no immediate damage. But the body will be at the end of their ability to adapt to stress, leading to disease, degeneration and loss of vitality. Unfortunately, the consequences are soback in time to eat the regime, few understand that means that the distance ratio.
So, before you register for bold statements about what is or is not good to eat carefully. The real test of the concept of health is too far into the future. Our greatest hope is well founded then it philosophically, before you slide your legs under the table.
How can we develop a philosophy and way of eating healthy food all the competing ideas? I'm here for an explanationvery simple principle, so reasonable that you do not even need to look for evidence. Follow along with me and see if you do not agree.
Consider the following three locations:
1 Just as a tree is genetically adapted to absorb certain nutrients from the soil and a lion is genetically adapted to thrive on prey, and a deer is genetically adapted to browse on vegetation, to which humans are genetically adapted to certain types of food.
2 Most of the foods that are currently suspended,A product of agriculture / industrial revolution and take a small part of the genetic history of humans. (Back, 276 miles to see the time line, they represent only a few centimeters of the dietary habits of industrial type.)
3 The natural, genetically, is suitable for people with food front. In other words, how could humans exist before the food was needed to survive? We were completely developed biologically before any method of agriculture and food industry.This means that the archetypal diet humans ate was the perfect diet because that diet was responsible for the existence and development of the human organism incredibly complex. The diet was the environment, the environmental nutritional womb, if you will, from which we were created.
If we consider these three premises, the logical conclusion is derived from it, which would be the best food for man, the food we eat to the way it is, as found in nature.
Our fabrics have beendeveloped for the nutrients of the foods to natural habitats of food, irrigated, no dyes, preservatives, plastics, nutrient strength lean and refined sugars and oils. Make no mistake, if we do not eat according to this principle, our bodies in perpetual shortage, imbalance and toxin exposure. To ignore the result of generations of this principle is an epidemic of obesity, chronic degenerative diseases and the impoverishment of our digestion.
A feature of all naturalThe food is that it is the first - in life, if you want. This is in accordance with the law of biogenesis, that life can come only from preexisting life, he says. Life creates life. Despite the dreams of scientists, on the contrary, we have never observed life from life, nor have we ever be able to create life from non-life in the laboratory. If we live to eat foods, we enhance our lives. When we are dead, devitalized foods we eat devitalized and dead. Granted, not all happen toworn only once, but as the reserves of adaptation are, we are like the dead, what we eat.
So a key feature of our natural diet is that it was raw. Yes, even meat, organs, eggs and insects - first. Remember, we are very backward in time, before the use of fire (not to mention the microwave, stove, oven, grill, fryer or extruder). Studies on the feeding of the cultures of primitive societies of the past and still today shows that just ate as their genes and the environmentdictated.
We were suddenly fell from space to earth with pans, matches and barbecues. We started on the forest floor, not the one behind the counter of fast food. We just had our only natural organism in a natural world, like any other creature. Every other organism on Earth eats raw foods like those found in nature. They believe that nature does not notice our decision to change everything?
Tofu wish to qualify? No, because the tofu is found nowhere in nature. WouldTo qualify for porridge? No, oatmeal, because it found nowhere in nature. It would be burgers, fries, pop, breakfast cereals, cereal, canned foods, sweets, drinks, muscle building powders, vitamins and minerals, mashed potatoes, carrot cake, croissants, sandwiches, Jolly Rancher, Ding Dong, Cocoa Krispies, Good 'n To qualify Plentys or Fig Newton? No. None of this is found as such in nature.
For those of you who put in hours of panic (if not choking) at the thoughtRaw, yes, there is the risk of foodborne pathogens. But if you are careful and clean, the danger is much less than the risk of eating for life is devitalized processed foods. Raw natural foods must be safe, or did not survive our ancestors, and we would not exist!
There is a choice. If before the election, why not opt for the wisdom of nature? Is not it strange we are the only creatures on the planet, to cook our food? Is it any wonder that, who succumball types of chronic degenerative diseases virtually unknown in living organisms eat natural raw diet?
In short, think of themselves in nature in the complete absence of modern technology. Ask yourself the question, what I eat ... and what can I eat? You can eat and digest fruits, nuts, insects, some plants, honey, worms, larvae, eggs, milk and meat from animals. It is only of food substances in nature human beings are able to digest without technology (including fire)Intervention. These are, in fact, the very foods that are the foundation of the primitive nomadic societies. Only when these foods are not only unpleasant, inedible foods such as cereals and most vegetables are cooked and processed to change their attractiveness to neutralize toxins and increase its digestibility.
That's where we were. But this has something to do with us here today in the 21 century old microwave? It has everything to do with us, because this is expansivehistorical context of how the body, as defined and served us. And 'this wild and untouched nature, that the vast majority takes our history and dominates our genetics. And 'the incubator, has become the life on planet Earth.
What would the food have been predominant in nature? Likely prey. Imagine back in time in the post with a family to feed. It will for most of the calories and foods rich in nutrients, could be found. Thatwould not be a few grains of wheat, some grass or a root. You could do all the herbivores, grazing and digestion, with their specialized stomachs that can convert virtually any plant material into protein and fats. Then you eat. I do not like it, but that's the way it is.
Pretty simple right? We should eat what nature provides that we can digest. But this is not in textbooks nutrition, nutritionists and PhD, without even declaredto understand. It crosses the whole theory, beliefs and assumptions. It corresponds to our natural body with our natural food.
Our immersion in modern kitchens and food processing has misled us. Foods such as cereals, tofu, cauliflower and lettuce, which is marketed as the ultimate healthy food is, in fact, not natural human foods at all. These products may or may not exist in nature, are as rare as you could ever bring food, or are pre-cooked and not edible in their raw formeven toxic.
For example, raw soybeans contain a variety of chemicals that can stunt growth and impair the body's own digestive enzymes. Eating enough of them and die. Cereals are the result of modern agriculture and are inedible in their raw, indigestible and toxic. In nature, one would never have enough grains of rice, wheat or barley, even in a meal, even if they were edible in their raw form. (Seedlings and grains are an exception to this sinceThey are healthy, nutritious and raw.)
Who, if you really, really hungry - and the options were available - would eat raw broccoli, cauliflower or lettuce? These foods are now only made palatable by cooking and dressings made with squeegees.
Now, this creates something of a dilemma. To know what our natural diet and consume it are two different things. We are so accustomed to the modern diet, the idea of eating raw meat, for example, for the most sickening acclimated.However, the tests may be eaten with great nutritional value for the primitive man (but nutritionally advanced) peoples, raw meat and organs, and are completely digestible and non-toxic. Some cultures also buried raw meat and left to rot (ferment) and then consumed with gusto. These companies are difficult to penetrate even in modern food. Then, like a bathtub ring dirt, modern degenerative diseases decimated the population to the periphery in contact with the modernFood.
It would be very difficult, today, the ideal raw material for a natural diet. But if the basic principle to keep in mind that helps us to remember our origins and we indicate the corresponding genetically adapted to the food.
This does not mean that processed foods should be eaten or cooked. It simply means that this is always the body of stress and genetic capabilities will ultimately result in less than optimal health.
Look around the supermarket (usually outsideLanes) and consider what it is, that could be eaten in its natural state. Increasing the percentage of such foods. Processed foods should be chosen so that a compromise among the lowest natural principles and as close to nature as possible. It is recommended to protect the whole foods, nutritional value and packed with care free of plastics, oils and refined sugars.
For example, whole milk yogurt, pasteurized or homogenized so far not perfect. The same would be better for pasteurized.The same is pasteurized and homogenized next. Worse would be fat-free, pasteurized, homogenized, artificially flavored and sweetened yogurt (which is, of course, to eat what the majority because they like best, what we use to season - candy).
Eating the best food you can find variety and moderation, and we will do the best you can do.
We have a few words, what had led to the discovery of decades of research, study and reflection. It 'simple and obvious, butThis is how all great truths.
No comments:
Post a Comment